Collarless Metal Ceramic Fixed Partial Denture: A Clinical Report

 

 

Wilson MATSUMOTO
Rossana P. de Almeida ANTUNES
Iara Augusta ORSI
Regina Maura FERNANDES

 

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil


Correspondence: Prof. Dr. Wilson Matsumoto, Departamento de Materiais Dentários e Prótese, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, 14040-904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil. Tel: +55-16-632-3888. e-mail: wilsonmatsumoto@aol.com.br


Braz Dent J (2001) 12(3): 215-218 ISSN 0103-6440

INTRODUCTION | CASE REPORT | DISCUSSION | RESUMO | REFERENCES


A case of a collarless metal ceramic fixed partial denture with preparations made at a slightly supragingival level is reported. The absence of the metal collar in the buccal portion of the abutments provides an excellent esthetic appearance. The use of a collarless metal ceramic fixed partial denture is a viable approach for restoring dentition where the esthetic quality is the primary concern.

Key Words: metal ceramic collarless, shoulder porcelain, esthetics, fixed partial denture.


INTRODUCTION

Collarless metal ceramic restorations combine the excellent esthetic quality of porcelain with the high strength of metal. The conventional metal ceramic restoration presents a metal collar on the buccal surface that provides good fitting and gingival contour. However, the presence of this metal collar may be esthetically unacceptable and the patient may be disappointed (1). Because of the disadvantages of a metal collar, the use of collarless metal ceramic restorations has become more popular (2-8).
The advantages of collarless metal ceramic restorations is the esthetic quality and the excellent biocompatibility of the glazed porcelain (9,10), as well as the fact that the fabrication of this type of restoration does not require special equipment and can be executed by a larger number of professionals. The disadvantages of collarless metal ceramic restorations are related to the difficulty of fabrication because of the sensitivity of the technique (7,11) that requires skill and meticulous care on the part of the operator, with the risk of producing restorations with poorer marginal adaptation compared to the metal restorations.
Several methods for the fabrication of collarless metal ceramic restorations have been described in the literature: platinum foil (3,12,13), refractory die (14,15), and direct lift-off (2,4,5,16-20). Because of its relative simplicity, direct lift-off is the method most frequently used by professionals. With this method it is not necessary to adapt the platinum foil to the die stone or to use the refractory die because the porcelain is applied directly to the die stone.
The objective of this article was to present a clinical case of a collarless metal ceramic fixed bridge.


CASE REPORT

RM, a 26-year old woman, was seen at the clinic of the School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, complaining about functional and esthetic discomfort in the anterosuperior region of the oral cavity. She had a direct adhesive prosthesis with broken connectors and poor esthetic quality (Figure 1). Occlusal, radiographic and clinical examinations were performed and the decision was made to remove the pontic and to make a collarless metal ceramic fixed partial denture. Figures 2 to 6 illustrate the major phases of the treatment. (Figure 1 - Figure 2 - Figure 3 - Figure 4 - Figure 5 - Figure 6)
The direct lift-off method to fabricate the buccal ceramic butt was used. After fitting of the soldered metal structure (Figure 4), it was treated and opacified as any metal ceramic crown, and the opacified metal structure was then readapted to the die stone.
To fabricate the buccal ceramic butt, a sealer (Die-Sealer, Ceramco, Burlington, NJ, USA) and a lubricant (Die-Release, Ceramco) were applied to the die stone. The shoulder ceramic was subsequently applied on the buccal surface of the opacified metal structure, and brushed in direction to the die stone. After condensation and drying, it was carefully removed and fired at a temperature between 10 to 20 degrees less than the firing temperature of the opaque. Correction of marginal fitting using the same shoulder ceramic was then done.
After the second firing of the shoulder ceramic, the restoration was completely fabricated using body and incisal ceramic. The firing of the body and incisal ceramic can be 10 to 20 degrees lower than the firing temperature of the shoulder ceramic. The buccal portion of the finished fixed partial denture was corrected at the glazing phase using low temperature ceramic to improve the fit of the ceramic butt margin.


DISCUSSION

Collarless metal ceramic combines the esthetic appearance of porcelain with the strength of metal. The use of a porcelain margin on the buccal surface mainly presents an esthetic advantage because the absence of a metal collar allows better distribution of color in this region. Another advantage is that the lack of metal allows the finished margin of the preparation to be located at the gingival level or slightly supragingivally without loss of esthetic quality (1,6) (Figure 6). The porcelain margin butt is biocompatible. Bacterial plaque accumulation is very low on this material and its extremely smooth surface is very well accepted by the gingival tissues (9,10).
The main disadvantage of the use of a collarless metal ceramic restoration is the sensitivity of the manufacturing technique (7,11). However, when manufactured by skilled laboratory technicians, these restorations present a clinically acceptable performance as shown in Figure 6 and as reported in other studies (6,7,11).


RESUMO

Matsumoto W, Antunes RPA, Orsi IA, Fernandes RM. Prótese parcial fixa metalocerâmica sem colar metálico: Caso clínico. Braz Dent J 2001;12(3):215-218.

O objetivo deste trabalho foi relatar um caso clínico de uma prótese parcial fixa metalocerâmica sem colar metálico. Os preparos foram realizados a um nível levemente supragengival, um procedimento que é favorável aos tecidos gengivais. A ausência do colar metálico na face vestibular dos pilares oferece uma excelente aparência estética. O uso de uma prótese parcial fixa metalocerâmica sem colar metálico é um método viável para restaurar a dentição onde a qualidade estética for de fundamental importância.

Unitermos: metalocerâmica sem colar metálico, cerâmica para ombro, estética, prótese parcial fixa.


REFERENCES

1. Salem G. Margin design for esthetic posterior metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:418-424.
2. Toogood GD, Archibald J. Technique for establishing porcelain margins. J Prosthet Dent 1976;40:237-243.
3. Goodacre CJ, Van Roekel NB, Dykema RW, Ullmann, RB. The collarless metal ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:615-622.
4. Jacobi R, Brooks TD. An intraoral lift technique for refining porcelain margins. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:433-435.
5. Duncan JD, Reeves GW, Fitchie JG. Porcelain shoulder technique using visible light activated resin. Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab 1991;8:77-84.
6. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Bertellli E, Mason PN, Russo J. Cement thickness and microleakage under metal ceramic restoration with a facial butted margin: An in vivo investigation. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;6:508-516.
7. Lomanto A, Weiner S. A comparative study of ceramic crown margins constructed using different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:773-777.
8. Matsumoto W, Baez RJ, Panzeri H. Comparative study of the direct-lift and platinum foil technique in the marginal discrepancy of collarless metal ceramic restorations. Braz Dent J 1996;7:109-113.
9. Wise MD, Dykema RW. The plaque-retaining capacity of four dental materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:178-190.
10. Chan C, Weber H. Plaque retention on teeth restored with full-ceramic crowns: a comparative study. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:666-671.
11. Chaffee NR, Lund PS, Aquilino AS, Diaz-Arnold AM. Marginal adaptation of porcelain margins in metal ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;6:508-516.
12. Brecker SC. Porcelain baked to gold: a new medium in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:801-810.
13. Choung CN, Garlapo DA, Brown MH, Sorensen SE. Procedures for a simplified collarless metal-ceramic restoration using gold powder. J Prosthet Dent 1982;46:449-453.
14. Sozio RB, Riley EJ. A precision ceramic-metal restoration with facial butted margin. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:517-521.
15. Vickery RC, Badinelli LA, Waltke RW. The direct fabrication of restorations without foil on a refractory die. J Prosthet Dent 1979;22:227-234.
16. Chiche G, Radiguet J, Pinault A, Genini P. Improved esthetics for the ceramometal crown. Int J Period Rest Dent 1986;5:77-87.
17. Edge MG, Maccarone T. An alternate method for establishing porcelain margins. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:615-622.
18. Ishii M, Satoh N. Fabrication of collarless porcelain fused to metal restorations without using a platinum matrix. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1986;6:65-73.
19. Prince J, Donovan TE, Presswood RG. The all porcelain labial margin for ceramometal restorations: a new concept. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:793-796.
20. Zalkind M. A labial porcelain butt-joint in ceramometal restorations. Quint Int 1984;15:1117-1120.


Accepted January 15, 2001


BACK TO CONENTS